Published in http://www.mydigitalfc.com/plan-and-policy/logistics-remains-critical-focus-area
Therefore, the only entity that can borrow significantly and
can spend in order to spur growth, is the government. Hence it is not
surprising that the government decided to breach the fiscal deficit target of
3.3% by 20 basis points in the Union Budget that was presented on February 01.
The Union Budget 2018-19, comes at a time when the Twin
Balance Sheet issues continues, wherein, both the banks and the corporates have
stretched balance sheets, which prevent the corporates from borrowing any
further for investments, while it also prevents the banks from lending any
further. In such a scenario, as expected, investments and growth has stayed
challenged, even though we see early signs of an upturn in growth.
The Union Budget therefore envisages a total spend of INR
24.42 trillion, and increase of INR 5.4 trillion (roughly 28% increase) from
the previous budget’s budgeted estimate.
|
2016-17
|
2017-18 BE
|
|
|
|
Gross Tax Revenues (Cr.)
|
17,03,243
|
19,11,579
|
Direct Tax (Cr.)
|
8,47,097
|
9,80,000
|
Indirect Tax (Cr.)
|
8,51,869
|
9,26,900
|
Non Tax Revenues (Cr.)
|
3,34,770
|
2,88,757
|
Fiscal Deficit ( % of GDP)
|
3.5
|
3.2
|
Revenue Deficit (% of GDP)
|
2.1
|
1.9
|
Primary Deficit (% of GDP)
|
0.3
|
0.1
|
Net Debt Receipts (Cr.)
|
5,34,274
|
5,46,532
|
Total expenditure ( Cr.)
|
20,14,407
|
21,46,735
|
Revenue expenditure (% of
total expenditure)
|
86.11
|
85.57
|
Capital expenditure (% of
total expenditure)
|
13.89
|
14.43
|
This obviously raises concerns of (a) abandonment of the
glide path to fiscal prudence, (b) stoking inflation and (c) sending wrong
signals to investors, thus impacting their sentiments. However, given the
situation of the economy, breaching the fiscal deficit appears to be a
necessary evil, and it is unavoidable that the associated public spend would
lead to inflation, which would happen in any growing economy. This was indeed a
tightrope walk call for the budget.
But the more interesting part is how the budget proposes to
make the public spending. It continued its signaling of focus on infrastructure
development with over INR 50 trillion being committed to for infrastructure
spend, which is not entirely through budgetary provisions, but through
off-balance sheet mechanisms. The economic impact of such infrastructure spends
comes in with significant lag that the economy can ill-afford at this stage.
Hence, it appears that by trying to put in more money in the hands of MSME’s
through reducing the corporate tax to 25%, and by putting more money in the
hands of farmers by providing a minimum support price that is 150% of the costs
of farming, there is an attempt to resolve the issue of distress in rural areas
and with MSME’s, while also injecting more disposable income which is expected
to increase consumer demand, thus kick-starting a virtuous cycle of more
investments and more jobs.
The only challenge in the above story appears to be the fact
that the 150% of cost support is only for the kharif season, whose crops would
hit the market only by around November, thus postponing the expected relief.
There are also concerns that the budgetary provisions for such a procurement is
not evident.
However, as per the expectation set in the 2017-18 budget to
reduce corporate tax from 30% to 25% over a period of time, atleast the same
has been done for MSME’s with turnover of less than Rs 250 crores, and hence it
signals the government’s intent to make India a lower tax country for
corporates. But a re-introduction of Long Term Capital Gains Tax (LTCG) of 10%,
while not removing the Securities Transaction Tax (STT – which was introduced
in lieu of LTCG being abolished earlier), turned out to be a dampener for the
storyline of being a lower tax regime destination for investments.
The theme of the Union Budget was clearly a focus on rural, women,
underprivileged and the marginalized as substantial announcements were made for
rural industries including fisheries and animal husbandry and for SC/ST’s. The
most spectacular part of the budget is the strong intent to strengthen the
social safety net by providing a whopping Rs 5 lacs per household health
insurance for 100 m households (which translates to covering 500 m households).
This is indeed the mother of all healthcare programs, if successfully
implemented. Alongwith it, the announcement of 1 medical college in every three
districts, setting up of high quality Eklavya schools and providing all-weather
motorable roads to every habitat, underlines the shift towards not just
providing benefits, but providing high quality benefits. Even if the above is
not achieved in the short-run, it sets the agenda for all future governments to
strive and deliver on these audacious targets.
Overall, the budget appears to have covered most of the
bases, leaving out the taxpaying salaried middle-class, who appear to have a
higher tax burden through increased cess and indirect taxes. The only concern
would be the developments in other parts of the world, such as the change in US
tax rates and possible hardening of US fed rates, which could suddenly put
brakes on the FDI, FPI and remittances inflows. Then again, a healthy forex
reserves of over USD 400 billion would help buffer Indian against any such
sudden brakes on fund flows.
No comments:
Post a Comment