Tuesday, November 26, 2019

India Vision 2035: Vision Ease of Living

Caselets of how India should be in Year 2035

After a night of celebrations on 31st Dec 2034, Aayush was scheduled to fly early morning from New Delhi to Bengaluru at 7:00 AM. He was reluctant to wake up early and was not sure if the flight will be on time due to weather conditions. He went off to sleep instructing his phone to wake him in time to catch the flight. As the case was, the flight did get delayed by 2 hours due to weather conditions and Ayush’s phone connected to the national flight system to get the information of the delay. So the phone woke up Ashish 2 hours later. The phone also plugged into the realtime city road congestion system and figured out that there is very little traffic in the city, as was expected on a new year day, and so automatically ordered for an autonomous cab to ferry Ayush from his home to the nearest metro, for Ayush to catch his flight on time.
Ayush was able to optimize his time and increase productivity while have a better quality of life by using the systems of a Cognitive Nation and a India Middleware.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

The Issue of Internet Governance


The Internet is a critical socio-economic enabler, which has deep impact on the economy, social order, law and order and the fabric of the nation itself. Its impact is only going to amplify as we move forward, especially when things start getting connected to each other and when the next generation of the Internet, IPV6 enabled Internet, starts getting rolled out. It would imply that your automobile can get connected to the cloud computing facility of the manufacturer for automatic analytics of the health of the automobile.
As per some estimates (refer note on Internet Governance at IIGF, New Delhi), the number of Internet-connected devices globally crossed 6 billion in 2011, and is expected to reach 15 billion, twice the size of the world’s population, before 2016. More than 6 billion mobile phone subscriptions are in use today, and the number is expected to cross 8 billion by 2016.  Mobile data traffic reached 597 petabytes in 2011, twice the amount of 2010, and is estimated to cross 10 exabytes by 2016. Broadband subscribers, estimated at 1 billion in 2011, are forecast to grow at 40% per annum, and reach 3.5 billion in 2016. As a large part of the growth is to take place in the developing countries of Asia, India can be expected to be a major component and beneficiary of this growth trajectory.      
The Internet started as a means of sharing information amongst scientist working in different institutions. From that, it is becoming – if not already become --the communications backbone of the world. It is a major economic driver, provides banking and other financial services to world’s business, provides a global market place and is replacing the conventional print and visual media. Internet is now ubiquitous in today’s world. Cutting off an enterprise or a country from the internet would have severe consequences.

This of course immediately also brings out the dangers that are emerging in such an interconnected world. The Internet can be used to bring down the telecommunications network of different countries, its banks and even its’ power grid. In Iran, we have seen the use of cyber weapons by the US and Israel taking out physically 10,000 centrifuges. If this had been done using a missile, it would have been considered an act of war. How should we then look at the Internet – also as a strategic space which then country’s need to protect? (ref. http://newsclick.in/india/internet-governance-and-itu-issues-baku-and-dubai by Prabir Purkayastha)
Therefore, a clear governance structure for the Internet, that is aligned to the long-term growth of the Internet and that is aligned to the interests of the economy and national security, is necessary for a healthy socio-economic functioning of a modern economy.
Internet Governance includes, but is not limited to, the following key issues:
[I] infrastructure and management of critical internet resources, including administration of the domain name system and Internet protocol addresses, administration of the root server system, technical standards, network neutrality, and multilingualisation; 
[ii] issues in the use of the Internet, including spam, network security and cybercrime; 
[iii] issues of wider impact such as Intellectual Property Rights [IPRs], freedom of expression, data protection and privacy rights, consumer rights and International Trade; and, 
[iv] developmental aspects, in particular, capacity-building.
From a socio-economic perspective, it impacts issues such as sovereignty over the Internet/ Free usage of Internet and interconnects, issues of Transborder data exchange and therefore its impact on Cloud Computing, issues of Data protection, the freedom of Internet, privacy, cyberwarfare and the issue of  global ban on use of Cyberweapons and cybersecurity.
Under the existing system of Internet governance, the International Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers [ICANN] performs two principal functions:
(a)  The Internet Assigned Names Authority [IANA] function whereby it controls entries to the authoritative Root Zone File of the Internet
(b)  The management of the Domain Name System [DNS] and the allocation of Top Level Domain [TLD] names. 
The function of allocation of TLD has been recently renewed as a perpetual contract, known as the Affirmation of Commitments between ICANN and the US Government. The IANA function has also been renewed for a seven-year period beginning 01 October 2012. The IANA function is overseen by the National Telecommunication and Information Administration under the US Department of Commerce. Technical standards are set by the Internet Engineering Task Force [IETF]. The central elements of the Internet's logical infrastructure, also called Critical Internet Resources, thus continue to be managed by private entities such as ICANN and IANA under contractual arrangements with the US Government (refer note on Internet Governance at IIGF, New Delhi.)

The United Nations established the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in 2005 to discuss the issues of Global Internet Governance. However, UN/IGF does not have the organisational structure or the mandate to agree on decisions and the enforcement mechanism to implement them.

There is therefore an urgent need to bring in participation by Governments, especially from the developing countries, in order to establish a multilateral, transparent and democratic Internet governance mechanism that functions with the full involvement of Governments, the private sector, civil society and international organizations, without according a pre-eminent role to any single Government or organization. Government of India is hence rightly formulating the policies for engaging in the reforms process required for a global participative Internet Governance structure.

The Concept of Critical Digital Infrastructure

Digital is having an increasing impact on the three aspects of national security – (a) internal security, (b) external security and (c) personal security
India has faced a series of internal security challenges that has emanated from the digital world. Such challenges include spreading of rumours that led to significant law and order situations that led to lynching and death of many. Digital has the power to spread misinformation in an explosive manner, and in very short period of time. Digital also has the ability to bring down Critical Information Infrastructure.
However, more importantly, we have reached a stage where many digital services such as mapping, social media, e-commerce etc have become digital utilities which, if affected, can lead to loss of jobs and disruption in the economy. Imagine if Google maps is suddenly withdrawn from India. It will impact the app based cab industry and would render millions jobless. Similarly, if WhatsApp stops working, it will disrupt many business models and impact normal day to day life.
Hence, we can safely label such digital utilities as Critical Digital Infrastructure, which needs to be protected. 
Unfortunately, in India, much of the Critical Digital Infrastructure, is not under the control of Indian entities and under limited control of the Indian government.